Methodology Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

methodology - Term Paper ExampleThe aim of this depth psychology is to assess Sartres theory of the emotions and how he, in his arguments, follows cosmopolitan scientific standards and the use of (appropriate) methods for the enquiry. As a core requirement in the presentation of an argument any(prenominal) scientific work has to begin by introducing the topic chosen in hurt of a interrogation question and a hypothesis (a preliminary, i.e. ahead of the actual research, answer to the question). One then has to decease by clearly stating the aim of the research and how angiotensin-converting enzyme wants to explore the problem by comparing unmatchable or the other literary source and concept. Importantly, one also has to define the topic by qualifying it and the literature in terms of a particular set of methods to be used and deemed appropriate, be they person-oriented and qualitative, or of a more quantitative nature, or a mix of the two groups. At this stage, follows the resu lts-section, an analysis and discussion of the data collected. Finally, conclusions and recommendations are made, and one also nones in which sense ones watch has tested the research question (Ellen, 1984). The Research Process Research, the search for knowledge and problem-solving, is a process whereby one continually adds to knowledge (Ellen, 1984). By this understanding, research is an ongoing process. There are, however, certain procedures to be followed and standards to be adhered to, be they of an inductive (experimental arriving at a theory based on facts) or deductive (facts are nonionized to match theory) nature. Based on this division, one arrives at a positivistic and relativistic stance, resulting in a contrast of explanation (deduction, positivism, quantification) and understanding (induction, relativism, qualification) (Alexander, 1983 Gellner, 1985)1. Thesis and hypothesis In his Sketch For A Theory Of The Emotions Sartre proposes a social and interactionist pers pective by stressing the concept of the social basis of emotions and the self. His border on is inductive and grounded in arguments and examples to prove his thesis. His work is, he contends (and the present author tends to agree), an important critique of the uncorrupted literature on the constitution of emotions, consciousness and mind represented by such philosophers-psychologists as William pile and Pierre Janet. Their focus is on the individual and his/her consciousness/mind as an analytical point of departure, an entity that make up a priori to ones argument (Sartre, 1985, pp. 32 ff.)2. Opposed to this and very revealing in terms of his empirical theory of emotions that are grounded in various fields of interaction with the social world (e.g., Mead, 1950) - Sartre states It consciousness arises as a relation of our psychic being and the world and this relation or rather our awareness of it is not a chaotic relationship between the self and the universe, it is an organiz ed and describable structure (Sartre, 1985, p. 34) In the last mentioned words, organized and describable, lie his procedure of proving his hypothesis regarding the social